ГлавнаяAgainst the New Post-2016-Trump Right TooОбразованиеУниверситет Атлас
Не найдено ни одного товара.
Against the New Post-2016-Trump Right Too

Against the New Post-2016-Trump Right Too

|
June 17, 2019

As part of my Neither right nor left mantra, another datum.

Most people use “right” and “left” journalistically: to designate shifting bundles of social-political beliefs and attitudes. The bundles are usually not internally coherent. So more analytic thinkers try to bring order out of mush by identifying multiple dimensions of contrast: individual versus collective, liberty versus authority, majority- versus minority-rule, etc. They abandon the simple one-dimensional left-right spectrum and use Venn Diagrams and other arrays better to capture the realities.

And/or they add adjectives to clarify the genus-species relations. For example, conservatives on the right become traditional conservatives, neo-conservatives, religious conservatives, and so on. And now we have Trump conservatives.

Here’s an important quotation from this helpful article by Matthew Continetti on what the “Trump right” is:

Beginning in 2016, intellectuals who favored Trump have been searching for a new touchstone for conservative thought and politics. These writers are often described as populists, but that label is hard to define. Broadly speaking, they have adopted the banner of nationalism. They believe the nation-state is the core unit of geopolitics and that national sovereignty and independence are more important than global flows of capital, labor, and commodities.

Pulling out the key phrases and their implications:

1. “Flows of labor”: Where and when to apply one’s labor is part of liberty rights.

2. “Flows of capital and commodities”: Where and when to use them are aspects of property rights.

3. “The nation-state is the core unit of geopolitics”: That means the individual is not the core unit of politics and the nation-state merely a proxy  or protector of the individual.

4. Integrating the above with “National sovereignty and independence are more important than …”, we get this result:

The nation is more important than the individual, and the sovereignty of the nation is more important than liberty and property rights.

And that is one more reason why I am not on the right, as much as I am not on the left. Both subordinate/suppress liberty and property rights, and both subordinate the individual to a collective (nation, proletariat, race/gender identity, etc.).

National conservatism is perhaps the best label for this post-2016-Trump package.

Yes, there are differences within conservatism and between conservatives and the left. But national conservatism overlaps with national socialism which overlaps with international socialism. And when drawing the Venn Diagrams to clarify who belongs inside which circle, it’s important to remember that there are other positions completely outside the circles.

conservative-liberal-2.jpeg

Source:
“Making Sense of the New American Right: Keeping track of the Jacksonians, Reformicons, Paleos, and Post-liberals.” Matthew Continetti, May 31, 2019)

Related:
“Conservatives Are Not Free-market Capitalists.”
“Conservatives: Get Over the Dark Ages.”
Both are part of my Open College with Stephen Hicks series.

Stephen Hicks Ph.D.
About the author:
Stephen Hicks Ph.D.

Stephen R. C. Hicks is a Senior Scholar for The Atlas Society and Professor of Philosophy at Rockford University. He is also the Director of the Center for Ethics and Entrepreneurship at Rockford University.

Он является автором книг Искусство рассуждать: Чтения для логического анализа (W. W. Norton & Co., 1998), Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault (Scholargy, 2004), Ницше и нацисты (Бритва Оккама, 2010), Предпринимательская жизнь (CEEF, 2016), Либерализм за и против (Коннор Корт, 2020), Искусство: Современное, постмодернистское и не только (совместно с Майклом Ньюберри, 2021) и " Восемь философий образования " (2022). Он публиковался в журналах Business Ethics Quarterly, Review of Metaphysics и The Wall Street Journal. Его труды переведены на 20 языков.

Он был приглашенным профессором деловой этики в Джорджтаунском университете в Вашингтоне, округ Колумбия, приглашенным научным сотрудником Центра социальной философии и политики в Боулинг-Грине, штат Огайо, приглашенным профессором Университета Казимира Великого, Польша, приглашенным научным сотрудником Харрис Манчестер Колледж Оксфордского университета, Англия, и приглашенным профессором Ягеллонского университета, Польша.

Получил степени бакалавра и магистра в Университете Гелфа, Канада. Доктор философии Индианского университета, Блумингтон, США.

В 2010 году он получил награду за выдающиеся успехи в преподавании в своем университете.

Его серия подкастов Open College публикуется компанией Possibly Correct Productions, Торонто. Его видеолекции и интервью представлены на сайте CEE Video Channel, а его веб-сайт - StephenHicks.org.  


Instagram Takeover Questions:

Every week we solicit questions from our 100K followers on Instagram (a social media platform popular with young people. Once a month we feature Stephen Hicks' answers to select questions, transcripts below:

Также несколько статей, отобранных с учетом возможного интереса к объективистской аудитории:

Не найдено ни одного товара.
Не найдено ни одного товара.